Canada HyperbaricsPhysician Guide

Physician Guide: Assessing Patients for HBOT

Clinical guideReviewed every quarterFor Canadian clinicians

For physicians assessing a patient's suitability for HBOT. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy is recognised by Health Canada for 14 conditions, and at Canadian hospital-based programmes it is delivered as adjunctive or primary treatment within an established referral pathway. This guide is a clinical, neutral aid to the suitability assessment: confirming that the patient has an approved indication, judging fitness for pressure, working through absolute and relative contraindications, flagging the small number of medications that genuinely change the calculus, ordering a sensible pre-treatment workup, and knowing when a conversation with the hyperbaric physician should happen before the patient is referred. It is not a substitute for the assessing hyperbaric physician's own judgement, which governs every treatment decision.

Confirming an approved indication

The first question in any HBOT assessment is whether the patient's diagnosis is one Health Canada recognises. The fourteen recognised indications are:

1. Decompression sickness 2. Carbon monoxide poisoning 3. Arterial gas embolism 4. Enhancement of healing in selected problem wounds 5. Soft tissue radiation necrosis (soft tissue radionecrosis) 6. Radiation damage affecting bone (osteoradionecrosis) 7. Gas gangrene (clostridial myonecrosis) 8. Crush injuries and acute traumatic ischaemia 9. Necrotising soft tissue infections 10. Compromised grafts and flaps 11. Refractory osteomyelitis 12. Sudden sensorineural hearing loss 13. Severe anaemia from exceptional blood loss 14. Acute thermal burn injury

Two points matter when you match a patient to this list. First, the strength of evidence varies considerably across the indications, from conditions where HBOT is standard of care to conditions where it is a time-critical or adjunctive measure layered onto definitive treatment. The indication being recognised does not, on its own, tell you how strong the expected benefit is; that belongs to the condition-specific discussion. Second, HBOT should be offered only for these recognised indications. Uses outside this list are investigational, and a suitability assessment should not be framed as if benefit were established for them. If the working diagnosis does not map cleanly onto one of the fourteen, that is itself a reason to discuss the case with the hyperbaric physician before referring.

Branching diagram of the fourteen Health Canada recognised indications for hyperbaric oxygen therapy, grouped into emergent and trauma, infection, radiation injury, and wound-healing categories.
Figure Health Canada recognises fourteen clinical indications for hyperbaric oxygen therapy, grouped by emergent and trauma, infection, radiation injury, and wound-healing categories.

Fitness for pressure

A recognised indication establishes that HBOT may be appropriate. The next question is whether the patient can tolerate the physical environment of the chamber, where ambient pressure rises during compression and falls during decompression. Several systems deserve specific attention.

ENT and middle-ear clearance. The middle ear is the most common site of barotrauma, because the pressure change during descent must be equalised across the eustachian tube. A patient who cannot auto-inflate the middle ear, or who has an active upper respiratory infection, significant nasal or sinus congestion, or eustachian tube dysfunction, is at raised risk of tympanic membrane barotrauma. Assess the patient's ability to equalise, treat active congestion before referral where possible, and note any history of ear surgery. Patients who cannot equalise voluntarily may still be treatable with slower compression or, in some cases, myringotomy or tympanostomy tubes, but that is a hyperbaric-team decision.

Chest imaging and untreated pneumothorax. Lung imaging before treatment is the rule, because an untreated pneumothorax is the most widely recognised absolute contraindication to HBOT: gas trapped in the pleural space expands on decompression and can precipitate a life-threatening tension pneumothorax. Beyond an existing pneumothorax, look for air-trapping pathology such as bullae, blebs, or significant obstructive disease that could lead to gas trapping. Any suspected pneumothorax must be drained before chamber entry.

Cardiac status. Compression and the oxygen load place a demand on the cardiovascular system, and there is a fluid-shift consideration on decompression. Patients with poorly compensated heart failure, particularly those with markedly reduced ejection fraction, are at risk of decompensation or pulmonary oedema and warrant cardiology input and a careful risk discussion before referral. Note implanted cardiac devices: pacemakers and similar devices must be confirmed as pressure-rated for the planned depth, which is verified against the manufacturer's specification.

Claustrophobia. Tolerance of an enclosed chamber is a genuine practical determinant of suitability. Severe claustrophobia can make monoplace treatment difficult; it may be managed with a multiplace chamber, behavioural measures, or pre-medication. Screen for it during the assessment rather than discovering it at the chamber door.

Seizure threshold and glucose in diabetics. Oxygen at pressure lowers the threshold for central-nervous-system oxygen toxicity, which can occasionally manifest as a seizure. A history of poorly controlled seizures, active fever, and certain medications can lower that threshold further; seizures should be controlled before treatment is initiated. In patients with diabetes, monitor glucose around sessions, because HBOT tends to lower blood glucose during treatment. One retrospective hospital dataset (77 patients, 1,825 treatments) reported a fall in blood glucose in about three-quarters of treatments, with a median decrease of roughly 25 mg/dL (about 1.4 mmol/L); in that series clinically significant hypoglycaemia was uncommon, but a patient who arrives already low could become symptomatically hypoglycaemic in the chamber. Practical screening of pre-session glucose, and coordination with the patient's diabetes care, belong in the suitability plan.

Body map showing the four systems screened for fitness for pressure: the ears for middle-ear equalisation, the lungs for gas trapping, the heart for cardiovascular demand, and tolerance of confinement.
Figure Fitness for pressure is assessed across the ears, lungs, heart, and a patient's tolerance of confinement before entering the chamber.

Absolute and relative contraindications

The contraindication picture in hyperbaric medicine is unusually lopsided: there is a short list of absolute contraindications and a longer list of relative ones that are weighed case by case.

Absolute. Untreated pneumothorax is the most widely recognised absolute contraindication, and it must be addressed before any treatment. Classical hyperbaric teaching also treats two concurrent medications as absolute contraindications while they are on board: concurrent bleomycin (because hyperbaric oxygen can trigger or accelerate oxygen-induced pulmonary fibrosis) and concurrent disulfiram (because it inhibits superoxide dismutase, the enzyme that neutralises hyperbaric-oxygen-generated free radicals). Some centres also treat the presence of intraocular gas as absolute for non-emergency indications because of the vision risk on pressure change. Prior bleomycin exposure with documented pulmonary clearance is a relative, not absolute, contraindication and calls for individualised pulmonary review before HBOT.

Relative. Relative contraindications do not automatically exclude a patient; they shift the risk-benefit balance and call for optimisation, monitoring, or a modified protocol. They commonly include:

The weight of any relative contraindication depends on the indication. An emergency indication such as decompression sickness, arterial gas embolism, or carbon monoxide poisoning shifts the balance toward treatment even when relative cautions are present; an elective wound or radiation indication allows more time to optimise the patient first. This balancing is the hyperbaric physician's call.

Two-column comparison listing absolute contraindications that must be resolved before entry against relative contraindications that are weighed against urgency.
Figure Absolute contraindications must be resolved before treatment; relative ones are weighed against the urgency of the indication.

Medication interactions

A small group of drugs interacts with hyperbaric oxygen in ways that change the assessment. They matter because the interaction is with the oxygen itself, not simply with the chamber, and because most are encountered in oncology patients who are also candidates for radiation-injury indications.

In a genuine emergency indication, these interactions are weighed pragmatically by the hyperbaric physician against the risk of withholding a time-critical treatment; in elective care they are respected as timing constraints. Either way, flag any of these agents in the referral so the hyperbaric physician can plan around them.

Four-panel grid of the medications that interact critically with hyperbaric oxygen: bleomycin, doxorubicin, cisplatin, and disulfiram, each with its mechanism of concern.
Figure Four medications carry critical interactions with hyperbaric oxygen: bleomycin, doxorubicin, cisplatin, and disulfiram.

Pre-treatment workup

A focused workup makes the hyperbaric physician's assessment faster and safer. Tailor it to the indication, but the common elements are:

Send the supporting documents with the referral rather than after it. A complete package shortens the interval to assessment and avoids the patient being turned away at the chamber for a missing chest film or an unverified pacemaker rating.

Five-step process flow for the pre-treatment workup: chest imaging, ENT check, cardiac and metabolic review, medication review, and documentation supplied with the referral.
Figure A complete pre-treatment workup moves from chest imaging through ENT, cardiac and metabolic review, medication review, and documentation.

When to discuss with the hyperbaric physician

Refer in the usual way for clear-cut, well-documented cases that fit an approved indication and carry no significant cautions. Speak to the hyperbaric physician before referring when the assessment is not clean, including when:

Canadian hospital-based hyperbaric programmes have established pathways for exactly these conversations, and the hyperbaric physician carries the final decision on suitability, protocol, and treatment depth. When the assessment leaves you uncertain, the discussion before referral is almost always faster than a referral that has to be unwound.

Decision tree showing that clear-cut elective presentations follow the standard referral pathway, while complicating factors route to direct hyperbaric physician consultation.
Figure Clear-cut elective cases follow the standard referral pathway; complicating factors warrant direct consultation with the hyperbaric physician.

Canada Hyperbarics, canadahyperbarics.ca. Reviewed each quarter. For clinicians; does not replace individual clinical judgement.