Altitude mountain sickness among tourist... (2011 study) Skip to main content
Review Journal of medical engineering & technology 2011

Altitude mountain sickness among tourist populations: a review and pathophysiology supporting management with hyperbaric oxygen.

Butler GJ, Al-Waili N, Passano DV, Ramos J, Chavarri J, Beale J, et al., Journal of medical engineering & technology, 2011

Tier 2, Indexed

Automatically imported from PubMed based on relevance criteria.

Summary

What Researchers Did

Researchers reviewed the biology behind altitude sickness in tourists and proposed that hyperbaric oxygen treatment could be a logical way to manage it, based on how low oxygen levels affect the body at high elevation.

What They Found

A narrative review proposes that a clinical hyperbaric chamber built for three atmospheres absolute (3 ATA) could treat altitude sickness using a specific low-pressure profile of 1.25 atmospheres absolute (1.25 ATA), adapted from protocols previously developed for the US military and NASA. The review states that conventional care manages altitude sickness with medication, oxygen, and portable-chamber recompression to an equivalent of 1524 to 2438 meters altitude using devices such as the Gamow Bag, an approach the authors say is not always acceptable for an elderly tourist population. The authors report that their proposed 1.25 ATA profile is intended to virtually eliminate the symptom rebound that conventional treatment often shows when a patient returns directly to the original altitude without recompressing to sea level or greater pressure. The abstract does not include original patient outcome data, sample sizes, or statistical tests supporting this claim.

What This Means for Canadian Patients

For Canadians traveling to high-altitude destinations, this review presents hyperbaric oxygen at 1.25 ATA as a proposed alternative to portable recompression bags, particularly for older travelers who may find a Gamow Bag less practical. Because the abstract describes a theoretical, physiology-based proposal rather than a clinical trial, patients should not assume this approach has been proven more effective than standard acclimatization, medication, and oxygen management for altitude sickness.

Canadian Relevance

No direct Canadian connection identified.

Study Limitations

As a narrative review proposing a treatment protocol based on pathophysiology rather than a clinical trial, the paper provides no sample size, comparative outcome data, or statistical analysis to confirm the claimed reduction in symptom rebound.

This plain-language summary was generated with AI assistance from the study's abstract; it has not been individually reviewed by a clinician. Always consult the source study and a qualified healthcare professional. See our editorial policy.

Was this summary helpful?

Study Details

Study Type Review
Category Decompression Sickness
Source Pubmed
PubMed ID 20836748
Year Published 2011
Journal Journal of medical engineering & technology
MeSH Terms Altitude Sickness; Humans; Hyperbaric Oxygenation

Cite This Study

Share

This study relates to Decompression Sickness. Read the full clinical overview, the evidence base, and Canadian treatment access for this condition.

Find a Canadian Clinic Treating Decompression Sickness

Browse verified hyperbaric facilities across Canada.

View Canadian Facilities

Disclaimer: This study summary is provided for informational and educational purposes only. It does not constitute medical advice. The information presented reflects the findings of the original research authors and may not represent the views of Canada Hyperbarics. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making treatment decisions.

Last updated: April 1, 2026 | Reviewed by: Canada Hyperbarics Editorial Team | Editorial process | Research sources | Counts & methodology