Comparative efficacy and safety of non-pharmacological interventions for erectile dysfunction:a systematic review and network meta-analysis | Canada Hyperbarics
Meta-Analysis Sex Med Rev 2026

Comparative efficacy and safety of non-pharmacological interventions for erectile dysfunction:a systematic review and network meta-analysis

He X, Li T, Huang W, Liu G, Yang T, Zhang X, et al. — Sex Med Rev, 2026

Tier 1 — Curated

Manually reviewed and included in the Canada Hyperbarics research database.

Summary

What Researchers Did

Researchers conducted a network meta-analysis of 31 randomized controlled trials (1,874 participants) comparing five non-drug treatments for erectile dysfunction: electrical stimulation (ES), exercise, low-intensity shockwave therapy, acupuncture, and HBOT.

What They Found

Electrical stimulation combined with exercise produced the greatest improvement in erectile function scores (mean difference: 6.81 points on the IIEF-5 scale, 95% CI: 3.50–10.12), ranked first with 98.1% probability. Electrical stimulation alone also showed significant gains (mean difference: 2.86). HBOT ranked lower than ES-based therapies and shockwave treatment in overall efficacy for erectile dysfunction.

What This Means for Canadian Patients

Erectile dysfunction affects an estimated 3 million Canadian men, and many do not respond adequately to medications. This review suggests that for Canadians seeking non-drug options, electrical stimulation combined with exercise is currently the most evidence-supported approach. HBOT was included in the analysis but was not among the top-ranked treatments for this condition.

Canadian Relevance

No direct Canadian connection identified. Erectile dysfunction is not a currently approved OHIP-covered indication for HBOT in Ontario.

Study Limitations

Evidence quality ranged from low to high across studies, and most individual trials were small; the low-to-moderate evidence for HBOT specifically means its true ranking among non-drug ED therapies remains uncertain.

Was this summary helpful?

Study Details

Study Type Meta-Analysis
Category Systematic Reviews
Source Pubmed
PubMed ID 41649306
Year Published 2026
Journal Sex Med Rev
MeSH Terms Humans; Male; Erectile Dysfunction; Network Meta-Analysis as Topic; Exercise Therapy; Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy; Acupuncture Therapy; Hyperbaric Oxygenation; Treatment Outcome; Electric Stimulation Therapy

Cite This Study

Share

Find a Canadian Clinic

Browse verified hyperbaric facilities across Canada.

View Canadian Facilities

Disclaimer: This study summary is provided for informational and educational purposes only. It does not constitute medical advice. The information presented reflects the findings of the original research authors and may not represent the views of Canada Hyperbarics. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making treatment decisions.