Diabetic foot osteomyelitis: a progress report on... (2008 study) Skip to main content
Systematic Review Diabetes/metabolism research and reviews 2008

Diabetic foot osteomyelitis: a progress report on diagnosis and a systematic review of treatment.

Berendt AR, Peters EJ, Bakker K, Embil JM, Eneroth M, Hinchliffe RJ, et al., Diabetes/metabolism research and reviews, 2008

Tier 2, Indexed

Automatically imported from PubMed based on relevance criteria.

Summary

What Researchers Did

A panel of experts reviewed the evidence on diagnosing and treating bone infection in diabetic foot ulcers, known as diabetic foot osteomyelitis.

What They Found

This systematic review of 19 studies (selected from 1168 identified papers) found no significant differences in outcome associated with any particular treatment strategy for diabetic foot osteomyelitis. The panel found no evidence that surgical removal of infected bone is routinely necessary. Bone biopsy culture results may help select targeted antibiotics, but there was no data showing any particular route or duration of antibiotic therapy works better than another. The review found no available evidence supporting adjunctive therapies such as hyperbaric oxygen, growth factor injections, or larvae therapy for this condition.

What This Means for Canadian Patients

For Canadian patients with diabetic foot osteomyelitis, this review indicates that treatment choices among antibiotic routes, durations, and surgical approaches have not been shown to differ in outcome based on available evidence. It specifically found no evidence to support hyperbaric oxygen as an add-on treatment for this condition. The authors describe the evidence base as limited, so treatment decisions should be individualized with a care team.

Canadian Relevance

No direct Canadian connection identified.

Study Limitations

Only 19 of 1168 identified papers met the panel's criteria for detailed data extraction, and the authors describe the overall data on treatment choices for diabetic foot osteomyelitis as limited.

This plain-language summary was generated with AI assistance from the study's abstract; it has not been individually reviewed by a clinician. Always consult the source study and a qualified healthcare professional. See our editorial policy.

Was this summary helpful?

Study Details

Study Type Systematic Review
Category Wound Care
Source Pubmed
PubMed ID 18442163
Year Published 2008
Journal Diabetes/metabolism research and reviews
MeSH Terms Anti-Bacterial Agents; Diabetic Foot; Diagnosis, Differential; Humans; Osteomyelitis; Prognosis

Cite This Study

Share

This study relates to Problem Wounds. Read the full clinical overview, the evidence base, and Canadian treatment access for this condition.

Find a Canadian Clinic Treating Wound Care

Browse verified hyperbaric facilities across Canada.

View Canadian Facilities

Disclaimer: This study summary is provided for informational and educational purposes only. It does not constitute medical advice. The information presented reflects the findings of the original research authors and may not represent the views of Canada Hyperbarics. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making treatment decisions.

Last updated: April 1, 2026 | Reviewed by: Canada Hyperbarics Editorial Team | Editorial process | Research sources | Counts & methodology