Evaluation of glucose monitoring devices in the hyperbaric chamber | Canada Hyperbarics Skip to main content
Study Mil Med 1995

Evaluation of glucose monitoring devices in the hyperbaric chamber

Price M, Hammett-Stabler C, Kemper G, Davis M, Piepmeier E — Mil Med, 1995

Tier 2, Indexed

Automatically imported from PubMed based on relevance criteria.

Summary

What Researchers Did

Researchers tested how accurately different commercially available blood sugar monitors worked inside a hyperbaric oxygen chamber at 2.36 atmospheres absolute (ATA).

What They Found

At 2.36 ATA, the Glucometer M+ showed higher blood sugar readings, while the Companion 2 and HemoCue showed lower readings. The One Touch II showed lower readings for high blood sugar (above 150 mg/dl), and the ExacTech Pen showed higher readings for low blood sugar (below 100 mg/dl). Overall, the accuracy of these blood sugar monitors was significantly affected by changes in atmospheric pressure.

Canadian Relevance

While this was not a Canadian study, it addresses a crucial safety concern for diabetic patients receiving hyperbaric oxygen therapy, which is a Health Canada-recognised treatment for conditions such as diabetic foot ulcers.

Study Limitations

A key limitation is that the study evaluated glucose monitoring devices from 1995, which may not reflect the accuracy of modern glucometers used today.

This plain-language summary is generated with AI assistance and checked against the source abstract before publication. See our editorial policy.

Was this summary helpful?

Study Details

Study Type Study
Category Uncategorised
Source Pubmed
PubMed ID 7783938
Year Published 1995
Journal Mil Med
MeSH Terms Atmospheric Pressure; Blood Glucose; Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring; Humans; Hyperbaric Oxygenation; Monitoring, Physiologic; Reproducibility of Results

Cite This Study

Share

Find a Canadian Clinic Treating Uncategorised

Browse verified hyperbaric facilities across Canada.

View Canadian Facilities

Disclaimer: This study summary is provided for informational and educational purposes only. It does not constitute medical advice. The information presented reflects the findings of the original research authors and may not represent the views of Canada Hyperbarics. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making treatment decisions.

Last reviewed: April 17, 2026 | Reviewed by: Canada Hyperbarics Editorial Team | Editorial process | Research sources | Counts & methodology