Hyperbaric oxygen therapy for diabetic ulcers... (2013 study) Skip to main content
Meta-Analysis International journal of technology assessment in health care 2013 Canadian

Hyperbaric oxygen therapy for diabetic ulcers: systematic review and meta-analysis.

O'Reilly D, Pasricha A, Campbell K, Burke N, Assasi N, Bowen JM, et al., International journal of technology assessment in health care, 2013

Tier 2, Indexed

Automatically imported from PubMed based on relevance criteria.

Summary

What Researchers Did

Researchers combined the results of previous studies to see whether hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) helps heal diabetic foot ulcers and prevent amputation.

What They Found

This systematic review and meta-analysis pooled data from twelve studies (six randomized controlled trials and six observational studies) out of 654 citations screened. In the randomized controlled trial data, HBOT was linked to a 60 percent reduction in major amputation risk, but this was not statistically significant (p equals .29); in the observational data, the reduction was 61 percent and was statistically significant (p equals .003). For unhealed wounds, the randomized trial data showed a relative risk of 0.54 with HBOT (p equals .10, not statistically significant), while the observational data showed a relative risk of 0.24 (p less than .0001, statistically significant). The authors concluded that due to limited randomized trial evidence, the benefits and harms of HBOT for diabetic lower limb ulcers cannot be conclusively established, and no significant effect on amputation rates was found in the randomized trial evidence or in the higher quality studies.

What This Means for Canadian Patients

For diabetic foot ulcers, this review found that the strongest evidence, from randomized controlled trials, did not show a statistically significant benefit of HBOT for reducing amputation or healing wounds, even though observational studies (which are more prone to bias) showed larger, statistically significant benefits. Patients and clinicians weighing HBOT for a diabetic ulcer should know that the more rigorous trial data in this review did not confirm a clear effect.

Canadian Relevance

No direct Canadian connection identified.

Study Limitations

The authors note that randomized controlled trial evidence was limited, and the positive results seen in observational studies were not confirmed by the higher quality randomized data, which found no significant difference in amputation rates.

This plain-language summary was generated with AI assistance from the study's abstract; it has not been individually reviewed by a clinician. Always consult the source study and a qualified healthcare professional. See our editorial policy.

Was this summary helpful?

Study Details

Study Type Meta-Analysis
Category Wound Care
Source Pubmed
PubMed ID 23863187
Year Published 2013
Journal International journal of technology assessment in health care
MeSH Terms Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Foot Ulcer; Humans; Hyperbaric Oxygenation; Treatment Outcome

Cite This Study

Share

This study relates to Problem Wounds. Read the full clinical overview, the evidence base, and Canadian treatment access for this condition.

Find a Canadian Clinic Treating Wound Care

Browse verified hyperbaric facilities across Canada.

View Canadian Facilities

Disclaimer: This study summary is provided for informational and educational purposes only. It does not constitute medical advice. The information presented reflects the findings of the original research authors and may not represent the views of Canada Hyperbarics. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making treatment decisions.

Last updated: April 1, 2026 | Reviewed by: Canada Hyperbarics Editorial Team | Editorial process | Research sources | Counts & methodology