Is Simple Reimplantation a Viable Option in Pediculated Auricular Avulsions? A Systematic Review of the Literature | Canada Hyperbarics Skip to main content
Systematic Review Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr 2025

Is Simple Reimplantation a Viable Option in Pediculated Auricular Avulsions? A Systematic Review of the Literature

Román Padilla J, Ortiz Peces L, Alavedra Martínez P, Cebrián Carretero J — Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr, 2025

Tier 1, Curated

Manually reviewed and included in the Canada Hyperbarics research database.

Summary

What Researchers Did

The researchers reviewed 16 studies involving 32 cases of ear avulsion injuries where a small piece of skin (pedicle) was still attached, to see if simpler reattachment methods work as well as complex microvascular surgery.

What They Found

They found that non-microvascular reattachment techniques appear to be a viable alternative, with most cases achieving graft survival and only two patients needing additional surgery. Venous congestion occurred in 11 patients and was significantly more likely with narrower pedicles (mean width 9.82 mm), but prophylactic heparin significantly reduced this risk (p = 0.007). Data on hyperbaric oxygen and leech therapy were insufficient for firm conclusions.

What This Means for Canadian Patients

For Canadian patients experiencing a partial ear avulsion where a skin pedicle remains, this research suggests that simpler reattachment methods might be a good option, potentially leading to similar outcomes as more complex microvascular surgery. While venous congestion is a common challenge, proactive management, possibly including prophylactic heparin, could improve the chances of successful ear reattachment and reduce the need for further surgery.

Canadian Relevance

The study is not Canadian and does not cover any Health Canada-recognised hyperbaric oxygen therapy indications. No direct Canadian connection identified.

Study Limitations

The development of standardized guidelines for these injuries is hindered by the limited number of reported cases and potential publication bias in the existing literature.

Was this summary helpful?

Study Details

Study Type Systematic Review
Category Systematic Reviews
Source Pubmed
PubMed ID 40989764
Year Published 2025
Journal Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr

Cite This Study

Share

Find a Canadian Clinic

Browse verified hyperbaric facilities across Canada.

View Canadian Facilities

Disclaimer: This study summary is provided for informational and educational purposes only. It does not constitute medical advice. The information presented reflects the findings of the original research authors and may not represent the views of Canada Hyperbarics. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making treatment decisions.