Survival rate and risk factors of implants in... (2026 study) Skip to main content
Meta-Analysis BMC Oral Health 2026

Survival rate and risk factors of implants in patients with head and neck neoplasms: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Liu Y, Yang C, Song Y, Sun Y, Wang H, Zhang Y, et al., BMC Oral Health, 2026

Tier 1, Curated

Manually reviewed and included in the Canada Hyperbarics research database.

Summary

What Researchers Did

The researchers searched four databases for studies on dental implants in people with head and neck tumours, then combined the results to estimate how many implants survived and what factors were linked to survival.

What They Found

This systematic review and meta-analysis of 42 studies (2,448 patients, 10,164 implants) found a pooled implant survival rate of 88% (95% CI: 85-90%), with very high variation between studies (I² = 94.9%). Follow-up ranged from 1 to 12 years. Implant survival was lower in irradiated bone than in non-irradiated bone (18 studies, RR 0.95; p = 0.03) and lower in grafted bone than in native bone (15 studies, RR 0.92; p = 0.0008). Implants in the front of the mouth had higher survival than those in the back (6 studies, RR 1.07; p = 0.008). Survival was higher in patients who had hyperbaric oxygen therapy than in those who did not (5 studies, RR 1.47; 95% CI 1.06-2.03; p = 0.02).

What This Means for Canadian Patients

For people with head and neck tumours who are considering dental implants, the abstract reports that radiation and bone grafting were linked to modest drops in implant survival. It reports that hyperbaric oxygen therapy was linked to higher survival, based on only five studies with high variation between them (I² = 91%). The authors say this finding needs confirmation in larger and randomized trials, so it does not show that the therapy caused the difference.

Canadian Relevance

No direct Canadian connection identified.

Study Limitations

The studies differed a lot from one another (I² = 94.9% overall), the survival rate was a crude proportion rather than a time-specific estimate, the hyperbaric oxygen finding rested on only five studies, and the review was registered retrospectively.

This plain-language summary was generated with AI assistance from the study's abstract; it has not been individually reviewed by a clinician. Always consult the source study and a qualified healthcare professional. See our editorial policy.

Was this summary helpful?

Study Details

Study Type Meta-Analysis
Category Systematic Reviews
Source Pubmed
PubMed ID 42092891
Year Published 2026
Journal BMC Oral Health

Cite This Study

Share

Find a Canadian Clinic

Browse verified hyperbaric facilities across Canada.

View Canadian Facilities

Disclaimer: This study summary is provided for informational and educational purposes only. It does not constitute medical advice. The information presented reflects the findings of the original research authors and may not represent the views of Canada Hyperbarics. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making treatment decisions.

Last updated: May 7, 2026 | Reviewed by: Canada Hyperbarics Editorial Team | Editorial process | Research sources | Counts & methodology