Between hope and uncertainty: the elusive evidence... (2026 study) Skip to main content
Systematic Review Support Care Cancer 2026

Between hope and uncertainty: the elusive evidence on hyperbaric oxygen therapy and radiotherapy

Cuccia F, Cracchiolo A, Piras A, D'Alessandro S, Carruba G, Mercadante S, et al., Support Care Cancer, 2026

Tier 1, Curated

Manually reviewed and included in the Canada Hyperbarics research database.

Summary

What Researchers Did

Researchers reviewed existing studies on using hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) alongside radiotherapy for cancer patients.

What They Found

This systematic review of 42 studies covering 2,785 patients found that HBOT was mainly used to manage tissue damage caused by radiotherapy, with a median of 34.5 sessions at 2.45 ATA. For hemorrhagic cystitis (bladder bleeding) in the pelvic region, which accounted for the largest patient group, HBOT showed response rates of 67-100%. In breast and head-neck cancer, retrospective reports showed improved quality of life and toxicity profiles, but randomized trials did not show consistent benefit. Evidence for preventing brain tissue damage after radiation was limited, and a possible role in making gliomas more sensitive to radiation was described as speculative. HBOT was generally safe, with mild side effects such as barotrauma and temporary nearsightedness.

What This Means for Canadian Patients

For Canadians treated with radiotherapy for pelvic cancers who develop hemorrhagic cystitis, this review found high response rates for HBOT, though the authors note the overall evidence is heterogeneous and often based on small, low-quality studies. For breast and head-neck cancer patients, benefits seen in retrospective reports were not confirmed in randomized trials, so the picture there is mixed. The abstract describes any radiosensitizing effect in gliomas as speculative, not established.

Canadian Relevance

No direct Canadian connection identified.

Study Limitations

The authors note that most included studies were retrospective with only 5 randomized controlled trials, and the overall evidence is heterogeneous and of low quality, meaning well-designed prospective trials are still needed to clarify patient selection and optimal HBOT parameters.

This plain-language summary was generated with AI assistance from the study's abstract; it has not been individually reviewed by a clinician. Always consult the source study and a qualified healthcare professional. See our editorial policy.

Was this summary helpful?

Study Details

Study Type Systematic Review
Category Radiation Injury
Source Pubmed
PubMed ID 41627499
Year Published 2026
Journal Support Care Cancer
MeSH Terms Humans; Hyperbaric Oxygenation; Neoplasms; Radiation Injuries; Quality of Life; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Uncertainty; Female; Radiotherapy

Cite This Study

Share

This study relates to Delayed Radiation Injury. Read the full clinical overview, the evidence base, and Canadian treatment access for this condition.

Find a Canadian Clinic Treating Radiation Injury

Browse verified hyperbaric facilities across Canada.

View Canadian Facilities

Disclaimer: This study summary is provided for informational and educational purposes only. It does not constitute medical advice. The information presented reflects the findings of the original research authors and may not represent the views of Canada Hyperbarics. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making treatment decisions.

Last updated: March 19, 2026 | Reviewed by: Canada Hyperbarics Editorial Team | Editorial process | Research sources | Counts & methodology