What Researchers Did
Researchers conducted a systematic review to critically examine the effectiveness of complementary and alternative therapies (CATs) for neurodevelopmental disorders.
What They Found
Most complementary and alternative therapies (CATs) for neurodevelopmental disorders, such as neurofeedback and music therapy, lacked robust evidence for use as primary treatments. Some CATs showed modest benefits as adjunctive strategies, while others like acupuncture and ozone therapy had insufficient scientific support and should not replace validated methods.
What This Means for Canadian Patients
Canadian patients and their families should be cautious about complementary and alternative therapies for neurodevelopmental disorders, as many lack robust scientific evidence. It is crucial to discuss all treatment options, including potential adjunctive therapies, with healthcare professionals to ensure evidence-based care and avoid unproven methods.
Canadian Relevance
This systematic review does not have a direct Canadian connection.
Study Limitations
A potential limitation of this systematic review is the inherent variability and often low methodological quality of the primary studies on complementary and alternative therapies.