Outcomes of Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy at 2.0... (2026 study) Skip to main content
Study Neurourol Urodyn 2026

Outcomes of Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy at 2.0 Versus 2.5 ATA for Hemorrhagic Radiation Cystitis

Soriano V, Laspro M, Lee W, Parker S, Taneja S, Brucker B, et al., Neurourol Urodyn, 2026

Tier 2, Indexed

Automatically imported from PubMed based on relevance criteria.

Summary

What Researchers Did

Researchers compared two hyperbaric oxygen therapy pressures, 2.0 ATA and 2.5 ATA, in patients being treated for hemorrhagic radiation cystitis, a bleeding bladder condition that can follow pelvic radiation.

What They Found

This retrospective chart review of 93 patients treated at two sites found that fewer patients treated at 2.5 ATA had gross hematuria within one year after therapy compared to those treated at 2.0 ATA (p less than 0.05). Time to hematuria recurrence did not differ between groups, at 10.2 months versus 9.6 months. Other urinary symptoms showed no difference between the two pressure groups, and treatment number and duration were similar across both. Adverse events were more common in patients treated at 2.5 ATA.

Canadian Relevance

No direct Canadian connection identified.

Study Limitations

This was a retrospective, non-randomized chart review at two sites, so it cannot establish that the pressure difference caused the outcomes observed, and the authors themselves state that randomized studies are necessary to determine causality.

This plain-language summary was generated with AI assistance from the study's abstract; it has not been individually reviewed by a clinician. Always consult the source study and a qualified healthcare professional. See our editorial policy.

Was this summary helpful?

Study Details

Study Type Study
Category Radiation Injury
Source Pubmed
PubMed ID 41603214
Year Published 2026
Journal Neurourol Urodyn
MeSH Terms Humans; Hyperbaric Oxygenation; Cystitis; Retrospective Studies; Female; Radiation Injuries; Middle Aged; Hematuria; Male; Treatment Outcome; Aged; Hemorrhage; Time Factors; Adult; Radiotherapy; Recurrence

Cite This Study

Share

This study relates to Delayed Radiation Injury. Read the full clinical overview, the evidence base, and Canadian treatment access for this condition.

Find a Canadian Clinic Treating Radiation Injury

Browse verified hyperbaric facilities across Canada.

View Canadian Facilities

Disclaimer: This study summary is provided for informational and educational purposes only. It does not constitute medical advice. The information presented reflects the findings of the original research authors and may not represent the views of Canada Hyperbarics. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making treatment decisions.

Last updated: March 19, 2026 | Reviewed by: Canada Hyperbarics Editorial Team | Editorial process | Research sources | Counts & methodology