Treatment effectiveness in interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome: Do patient perceptions align with efficacy-based guidelines? | Canada Hyperbarics Skip to main content
Clinical Guideline Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada 2018 Canadian

Treatment effectiveness in interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome: Do patient perceptions align with efficacy-based guidelines?

Lusty A, Kavaler E, Zakariasen K, Tolls V, Nickel JC — Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada, 2018

Tier 2, Indexed

Automatically imported from PubMed based on relevance criteria.

Summary

What Researchers Did

Researchers surveyed 1628 adult females with interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome (IC/BPS) to compare their perceived treatment outcomes with efficacy data from clinical trials and existing guidelines.

What They Found

Patients (n=1628) reported opioids, phenazopyridine, and alkalizing agents as most effective, with amitriptyline and antihistamines moderately effective. The only surgical procedure perceived as effective was electrocautery of Hunner's lesions, while guidelines prioritize therapies like cyclosporine A and botulinum toxin A. This indicates a general disconnect between patient perceptions of treatment success and efficacy-based guidelines.

What This Means for Canadian Patients

Canadian patients with IC/BPS may find that treatments recommended in guidelines do not always align with their personal experiences of effectiveness. This highlights the importance of shared decision-making between patients and clinicians to ensure treatment plans consider both evidence and individual patient perceptions.

Canadian Relevance

This study was published in a Canadian journal and involved Canadian researchers, directly addressing treatment effectiveness for IC/BPS, a condition affecting Canadians.

Study Limitations

A key limitation is the reliance on self-reported diagnoses and patient perceptions via a web-based survey, which may introduce recall and selection bias.

Was this summary helpful?

Study Details

Study Type Clinical Guideline
Category Systematic Reviews
Source Pubmed
PubMed ID 29173267
Year Published 2018
Journal Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada

Cite This Study

Share

Find a Canadian Clinic

Browse verified hyperbaric facilities across Canada.

View Canadian Facilities

Disclaimer: This study summary is provided for informational and educational purposes only. It does not constitute medical advice. The information presented reflects the findings of the original research authors and may not represent the views of Canada Hyperbarics. Always consult a qualified healthcare professional before making treatment decisions.